Scriptme.net fresh news

This is hardly the first time we've seen such a case. In fact, the issue of whether or not companies can force their consumers to go to binding arbitration (which sides with the company somewhere around 95% of the time) over filing a class action lawsuit has been decided in favor of the consumers' rights to file the lawsuits over and over and over again. So, it shouldn't come as a huge surprise that a court has told AT&T that it cannot force customers into binding arbitration rather than a class action lawsuit over bogus fees it charged.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

Canadian Regulators Say Bell Canada's DSL Throttling Is Fine

Parody Is Still Fair Use Last We Checked

Could You Google Bomb Google Flu?

All-Star Witness List In Lawsuit Over Constitutionality Of RIAA Lawsuits

Guns N' Roses Loves Online Music, On Its Own Terms

Movie Studios Sue Australian ISP For Not Waving Magic Wand And Defeating Piracy

Video Game Without DRM Has Piracy Rates About The Same As DRM'd Games

Yes, Actually, Music Can Be Free

Sega Apparently Learned Nothing From EA's Spore-DRM Mistakes

Singers Sue Label For Failing To Sue Others For Infringement

Facebook Sued For Patent Infringement

Yet Another Study Shows That Social Networks Are Good For Kids

Google Kills Lively Quickly

Nathan Myhrvold Now Capitalizing On Failed University Patent Intitiatives

Yellow-Pages Publishers Teetering On The Brink

Spammers Trying To Regain Control Over Cut Off Spam Bots

Kentucky Appeals Court Tells Kentucky To Hold Off Seizing Domains

Should It Be Illegal To Sell A Keylogger? Or Just To Use It?

Lori Drew's Lawyers Worried About Finding Jury That Hasn't Prejudged Drew

RIAA Agrees To Settlement, Then Asks For Twice As Much